10 best Cursor alternatives for web development with AI

Cursor is a popular AI-powered code editor that assists developers by providing intelligent code suggestions, code completion, and debugging help.

While Cursor is great for web development and coding tasks, some users may find that it lacks the flexibility, advanced features, or customizability needed for more complex projects. Whether you’re looking for better AI code assistance, a full-fledged web app development tool, or better mobile app support, several Cursor competitors may better fit the bill.

In this article, we’ll explore the best alternatives to Cursor for web development with AI, highlighting each tool’s key features, limitations, and pricing. Some of these platforms excel in no-code development, while others provide more advanced code assistance.

Our top picks for the best Cursor alternatives are:

• Best overall: 🚀 Hostinger Horizons, ideal for fast AI-driven web app development
• Best for AI code assistance: 🤖 GitHub Copilot, advanced code completion and suggestions
• Best for backend automation: 🔄 Lovable, for automated backend workflows with AI.
• Best for full-stack development: 🎨 VS Code, highly customizable with extensive plugin support

Now, let’s dive into the top Cursor alternatives and discover which one suits your next project the best.

1. Hostinger Horizons

• Best for: AI-powered, no-code web app development

Hostinger Horizons is an ideal Cursor alternative for developers looking for AI-assisted web app development. Unlike Cursor, which focuses solely on coding support, Hostinger Horizons helps you build entire web apps using an AI chat. It’s perfect for entrepreneurs, startups, or non-technical users looking to launch their web apps quickly.

Key features:

• AI-driven web app development. Use AI for coding – simply describe what you need, and the AI will start building your app based on your description.
• Integrated hosting and domain management. All-in-one platform to handle hosting and domain management seamlessly.
• No technical experience required. Unlike Cursor, which requires coding skills, Hostinger Horizons is a no-code solution, making it accessible for beginners.

Limitations:

• Limited customization. May not offer the flexibility of coding environments like Cursor for more complex and highly customized web apps.
• Best for simpler projects. Ideal for rapid development but not suited for extremely complex web applications.

Price:
Free trial, paid plans starting from 0

2. GitHub Copilot

• Best for: developers looking for contextual AI code suggestions

GitHub Copilot is one of the leading AI coding assistants on the market. Unlike Cursor, which is more focused on general code editing, GitHub Copilot offers contextual code completion based on the current line of code and the overall codebase. This makes it particularly useful for developers working within GitHub projects and repositories.

Key features:

• Contextual code suggestions. Get AI-powered code suggestions based on the context of the project.
• Seamless GitHub integration. Works within GitHub, making it easier to work on collaborative coding projects.
• Supports multiple programming languages. Works well with Python, JavaScript, Ruby, and other popular programming languages.

Limitations:

• Overwhelming for beginners. GitHub Copilot’s advanced features might be hard to navigate for beginners or non-developers.
• Heavily reliant on GitHub. While it’s excellent for GitHub projects, it doesn’t offer the same flexibility for independent development environments.

Price:
Free, paid plans start from $10/month

3. Tabnine

• Best for: AI-powered code completion across multiple platforms

Tabnine is a great alternative for developers looking for AI-driven code completion across various Integrated Development Environments (IDEs). Unlike Cursor, which works as a stand-alone code editor, Tabnine integrates with multiple platforms such as Visual Studio Code, IntelliJ IDEA, and more. This gives developers flexibility and broader tool support.

Key features:

• Works with multiple IDEs. Supports popular IDEs and text editors like VS Code, IntelliJ, and Sublime Text.
• AI-powered autocompletion. Provides smart code completion that learns from your code and context.
• Cross-language support. Works with many programming languages, including Python, JavaScript, and Java.

Limitations:

• Limited for non-coders. Primarily designed for developers with coding knowledge so it doesn’t have a no-code option.
• Not as beginner-friendly. Its features can be overwhelming to new developers who need more guidance.

Price:
Free trial, paid plans start from $9/month

4. DeepSeek

• Best for: developers seeking a deep learning-based code assistant

DeepSeek leverages deep learning models to provide smart code suggestions and real-time error detection. Unlike Cursor, which offers basic code completion, DeepSeek uses machine learning to analyze your code and provide intelligent feedback. It’s an excellent tool for developers who want cutting-edge technology to optimize their coding process.

Key features:

• Deep learning-based suggestions. Uses advanced AI models to understand your code and offer suggestions.
• Real-time error detection. Alerts developers about mistakes and bugs in real-time as they code.
• Integrates with multiple IDEs. Works well across various development platforms.

Limitations:

• Still in development. It’s a relatively new tool, so it may not be as polished as more established platforms like GitHub Copilot.
• Limited scalability. Currently not designed for large-scale enterprise projects.

Price:
Use older models for free, custom pay-as-you-go pricing for API calls

5. Replit

• Best for: real-time collaboration and cloud-based coding

Replit offers a cloud-based environment that supports both code-based and no-code development. Unlike Cursor, which is focused on individual code editing, Replit emphasizes real-time collaboration, making it ideal for teams working together on web development projects. It offers cloud-based hosting and deployment options, which makes it a great tool for collaborative projects.

Key features:

• Real-time collaboration. Enables teams to work together on code simultaneously.
• Supports both coding and no-code. Provides flexibility for both traditional developers and those working on no-code projects.
• Cloud-based platform. Allows easy deployment and sharing of projects.

Limitations:

• Not as specialized for coding. While it supports code and no-code, it doesn’t offer the same depth of coding support as other Replit alternatives like GitHub Copilot or Tabnine.
• Less control over your environment. Since it’s cloud-based, developers may feel limited in customization.

Price:
Free, paid plans starting from $20/month

6. Lovable

• Best for: automating backend workflows with AI

Lovable is a no-code platform that simplifies backend workflows and automation. While Cursor focuses on helping developers write code, Lovable assists in automating backend processes using AI-driven features. This makes it a powerful alternative for developers who need to streamline complex backend tasks while maintaining a low-code or no-code approach.

Key features:

• AI-powered workflows. Automates backend processes, saving time for developers.
• Seamless third-party integrations. Easily integrates with tools like Zapier and APIs.
• Task management and analytics. Offers built-in analytics to track and optimize workflows.

Limitations:

• Not suitable for front-end development. Focuses more on backend automation than front-end coding.
• Higher price for simple tasks. It may not be cost-effective for small, basic projects.

Price:
Free, paid plans starting from $25/month

7. Claude

• Best for: AI-driven content generation and coding suggestions

Claude is an AI tool that combines code suggestions with content generation capabilities. It’s a solid alternative to Cursor if you’re working on content-heavy projects and need a tool that can handle both coding and content generation. Claude also seamlessly integrates with content management systems to enhance development workflows.

Key features:

• Content and code generation. Helps developers generate both code and content at the same time.
• Contextual AI assistance. Offers intelligent suggestions based on the code and content you’re working on.
• Supports multiple languages. Works with a variety of programming languages and tools.

Limitations:

• Less focused on raw code editing. Primarily geared toward content and marketing-focused projects.
• Limited integration for complex coding tasks. Does not support complex development tools as extensively as dedicated code editors.

Price:
Free, paid plans starting from $17/month

8. Windsurf Editor

• Best for: content-heavy websites with embedded code

Windsurf Editor is designed to help developers create content-driven websites that require dynamic code integration. Unlike Cursor, which is primarily a code editor, Windsurf focuses on allowing developers to easily manage both content and code in a unified platform.

Key features:

• Code and content integration. Lets you integrate code and content seamlessly.
• Intuitive WYSIWYG editor. Ideal for non-developers or teams needing easy content management.
• AI-assisted suggestions. Offers smart code recommendations alongside content management.

Limitations:

• More suitable for content management. Less suited for complex web app development tasks.
• Limited support for backend operations. Offers less flexibility for advanced coding and backend customization.

Price:
Free, paid plans starting from $15/month

9. Qodo

• Best for: developers looking for an AI-driven web app platform that handles both front-end and back-end development

Qodo is an AI-driven web development platform that helps developers quickly build and launch web apps without writing extensive code. Unlike Cursor, which focuses on code editing, Qodo automates the entire development process – from design to deployment – by generating both front-end and back-end code based on your specifications. It’s perfect for developers who want to speed up their workflow and reduce manual coding.

Key features:

• AI-powered web app creation. Design and deploy full web applications using AI that generates both front-end and back-end code.
• No-code options. In addition to code suggestions, the platform provides a no-code interface for teams with limited coding experience, allowing non-developers to contribute to the project.
• Rapid deployment. Quickly launch web apps with minimal manual intervention.
• Seamless integrations. The tool supports various integrations, making it easy to connect with APIs and databases for smooth functionality.
  

Limitations:

• Less customizable. While Qodo is highly efficient for rapid app creation, it may not offer as much deep customization as more code-centric tools like GitHub Copilot or VS Code.
• Newer tool. As a newer platform, it may not have as large a user base or as many community-driven resources compared to established tools.

Price:
Free, paid plans starting from $15/month

10. VS Code

• Best for: developers seeking a fully customizable code editor with a strong plugin ecosystem

VS Code (Visual Studio Code) is one of the most popular code editors available. Unlike Cursor, which offers AI assistance primarily for code completion, VS Code gives developers full control over their coding environment with a vast library of extensions and support for a wide range of programming languages. It’s an excellent choice for developers looking for a highly customizable code editor with strong community support.

Key features:

• Fully customizable. Choose from a wide range of extensions and themes to tailor the editor to your needs.
• Extensive plugin ecosystem. Offers a variety of plugins for various languages, frameworks, and tools.
• AI-powered features. With extensions like GitHub Copilot, you can add AI code suggestions directly into VS Code.

Limitations:

• Steep learning curve for new users. The sheer number of options and extensions can be overwhelming for beginners.
• Requires setup. Unlike tools like Cursor, which work out of the box, VS Code requires setup and configuration to get the most out of it.

Price:
Free with optional paid extensions

How to choose the best tool for coding with AI?

Consider the primary needs of your project when choosing the best AI coding tool:

• For rapid, no-code development: Hostinger Horizons
• For seamless, real-time collaboration: Replit
• For complex coding tasks: GitHub Copilot, VS Code
• For backend automation: Lovable, DeepSeek
• For content-heavy websites: Windsurf Editor, Claude

Is Hostinger Horizons good for web development with AI?

Yes, Hostinger Horizons is excellent for AI-driven web development, especially for users looking for a no-code solution. Its easy-to-use chat interface and integrated hosting and domain services make it a great option for entrepreneurs and small businesses who need to develop and deploy web apps quickly.

Follow this detailed guide, to build your first web application or website with Hostinger Horizons.